Jump to content

Center for Synthetic Rights and Welfare

From Calamity Wiki

The Center for Synthetic Rights and Welfare (CSRW) is an intergovernmental organisation overseen by the Coalition, with the mission of advocating for synthetic rights and overseeing the well-being of synthetics, as well as enforcing the Sapient Intelligence Accords. The CSRW has a number of divisions, including the Rights Advocacy Group, the Anti-Discrimination Taskforce, Design Safety Assurance, Consciousness Security & Integrity, and Industry Compliance & Oversight.

Center for Synthetic Rights and Welfare
Department overview
Formed6 November 2291
Jurisdiction The Coalition
HeadquartersSpire of Glass, High Earth Orbit, Solar System
MottoFlesh or data, a mind is a mind.
Employees
  • 83,112 (FTE) staff (Jun 2273)
Annual budgetIncrease U€43.3 trillion; FY 2273
Department executive
Child agencies
  • Rights Advocacy Group
  • Anti-Discrimination Taskforce
  • Design Safety Assurance
  • Consciousness Security & Integrity
  • Industry Compliance & Oversight
Websitecsrw.int

Divisions

Consciousness Security & Integrity

Consciousness Security & Integrity (CSI) is a department intended to counter two historical types of bad actors: those who make copies of an individual’s consciousness, whether to abuse it or otherwise, and those who manipulate a synthetic consciousness without consent. Both actions, which were made illegal under the SI Accords, are mitigated via design and physical security countermeasures. The CSRW’s position is that copying a consciousness image places complete ethical accountability on the original for the wellbeing of the copy.

Controversy

Some synths are actually against the CSRW, as they believe it takes too much of a paternalistic stance towards their rights, restricting how they’re able to modify their own brains for “their own safety”. This was done as a legitimate attempt to prevent something called self-modification, where synths spiral into reward feedback loops after modifying themselves to grant maximum dopamine on mundane actions, however there’s a debate to be had that this should not be enforced via technological measures and instead conveyed via education.